TO: EVOC 501 Course Instructor
FROM: Phil Fournier
(Dr. Pendleton, my penmanship is terrible. I trust this is acceptable. Let me know if not and I will change it)
EA1 SELF EVALUATION OF WR1
Scholar's Name: Phil Fournier
Clearly hand print or write comments in all three of the following sections:
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE - Briefly describe what someone should reasonably be able to do as a result of reading the WR1 report (consider the purpose of the report).
Anyone who reads this report should be able to locate resources that would be appropriate to a course in Computerized Engine Control Level 1
POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT - Using words like "Good", "Very Good" and/or
"Excellent", briefly describe two things relating to how well the WR1 report was written, that you feel are worthy of praise.
Phil: Your course description was very complete. Your list of resources included an excellent variety of options for the student to obtain information relevant to the course.
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM - Considering things like content, format, literary style,etc., make one specific suggestion that clearly describes how something about the WR1 report could be improved.
Phil: Proof-read your work, recalling that the spell checker is not perfect. See misspelled word “somewhat” wrongly spelled “someone” in the first resource, second paragraph.